SOCIAL SCIENCE LENS

A World Journal of Human Dynamics and Social Relations
ISSN Online: 3028-1997 | Print: 3028-1962

Open access

Article credentials

Original Research

Social Support, Psychological Distress, and Mental Health Literacy among Educators in Special Education

A World Journal of Human Dynamics and Social Relations

ISSN Online: 3028-1997 | Print: 3028-1962

Volume 7 | Issue 1 | 2026 | 130 – 143

Marylle Anne A. Monsod1, ORCID No. 0009-0009-4270-6144

Kaye Lois S. Mirano4, ORCID No. 0009-0008-1931-1585

Patricia Allen G. Ola4, ORCID No. 0009-0004-2372-7875

Kyla Marie P. Oxiano4, ORCID No. 0009-0004-5749-2816

Eleona Mae C. Yana4, ORCID No. 0009-0002-4253-8514

Bryan A. Rebancos1, ORCID No. 0009-0004-4919-6849

Joseph S. Callanta2, ORCID No. 0000-0001-5807-0851

Hazelyn H. Dela Cruz3, ORCID No. 0000-0003-1363-7417

1Faculty, Department of Arts and Sciences, Cavite State University-Silang Campus, Silang, Cavite, Philippines
2Chairperson, Department of Arts and Sciences, Cavite State University-Silang Campus, Silang, Cavite, Philippines
3Psychology Program Coordinator, Cavite State University-Silang Campus, Silang, Cavite, Philippines
4Student, Cavite State University-Silang Campus, Silang, Cavite, Philippines, Silang, Cavite, Philippines

Article History:

Initial submission: 17 October 2025
First decision: 20 October 2025
Revision received: 10 March 2026
Accepted for publication: 20 March 2026
Online release: 28 March 2026

Quick links

Ready to submit? Click the button below.

Need more help before you submit?

Abstract

Special Education (SpEd) teachers are vital for providing education that meets the diverse needs of students with special needs, thus, understanding them is crucial. This study aimed to determine the relationship between social support, psychological distress, and mental health literacy among SpEd teachers in Cavite, Philippines. Employing a correlational design and purposive sampling, 138 SpEd teachers answered questionnaires that assessed social support, psychological distress and mental health literacy. Findings revealed that SpEd teachers reported high levels of social support, mild psychological distress, and a below average level of mental health literacy. Notably, a weak, negative significant relationship was identified between social support and psychological distress and a weak, positive relationship between social support and mental health literacy. Conversely, no significant relationship was found between psychological distress and mental health literacy. Despite the demands of their work, SpEd teachers reported a high level of social support. This extensive network proved helpful, giving them emotional, practical, and informational support when needed. Significant others, in particular, emerged as an important source of support for SpEd teachers. The result also indicated that the participants likely experienced mild distress, characterized by intermittent periods of emotional suffering that may significantly impact their overall quality of life. As a result, it is recommended to use findings for self-reflection, maintain strong social support, encourage communication for students with special needs, and suggest parents continue providing support. Furthermore, future researchers are advised to address limitations by exploring diverse settings and using qualitative designs. Psychosocial support and its relationship with psychological distress and mental health may also be investigated.

Keywords: social support, psychological distress, mental health literacy, special education, special education teachers

Cite this article

APA (7th edition)

Monsod, M. A. A., Mirano, K. L. S., Ola, P. A. G., Oxiano, K. M. P., Yana, E. M. C., Rebancos, B. A., Callanta, J. S., & Dela Cruz, H. H. (2026). Social support, psychological distress, and mental health literacy among educators in special education. Social Science Lens: A World Journal of Human Dynamics and Social Relations, 7(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.ssl-wjhdsr.7.1.SC-1025-006.

Author contributions

– (Not available) 

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors no conflict of interest.

Institutional ethics review statement

This study involved human respondents; however, formal ethical approval was not sought from the authors’ institution. The authors affirm that participation was voluntary, informed consent was obtained, and confidentiality of responses was strictly maintained. No procedures were undertaken that posed risk or harm to the participants.

Data availability statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the manuscript and its supplementary materials.

Declaration of generative AI use/assistance

No AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Cavite State University for supporting this undertaking.

Publisher’s disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. The publisher disclaims any responsibility for errors or omissions.

×

Cart