
Menu


Pedagogy Review
Volume 8 | Issue 1 | 2026 | 199 – 214
Article History:
Initial submission: 25 May 2026
First decision: 30 May 2026
Revision received: 08 July 2026
Accepted for publication: 13 July 2026
Online release: 17 July 2026
Ready to submit? Click the button below.
Need more help before you submit?
Experiential learning integrates experience, reflection, and application, offering pre-service teachers authentic opportunities to connect theory with practice and prepare for classroom realities. This study investigated the academic and practical preparedness of third-year Bachelor of Elementary Education (BEEd ) students for Experiential Learning Course, focusing on their competencies in academic content mastery, instructional delivery, classroom management, instructional materials and technology, and intrinsic motivation. A descriptive quantitative design was e mployed, using a validated researcher-made survey administered to all 63 third-year BEEd students through total population sampling. Data were analyzed using weighted mean and ranking to determine levels of preparedness. Findings revealed that students generally rated themselves as “Prepared” across all domains. Strengths were evident in less on planning, classroom routines, and intrinsic motivation, while notable gaps emerged in handling classroom disruptions, formulating higher order questions, and designing assessments for critical thinking. These results highlight the transitional challenge s faced by thirdyear BEEd students as they move from theoretical coursework to practical classroom application. The study recommends practice-based learning, inquiry-driven strategies, simulation-based classroom management, workshops, seminars, and mentorship programs to bridge th e gap between theory and practice. By addressing these areas, teacher education programs can better equip pre-service teachers for experiential learning and real-world classroom demands. This research contributes to Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality Education, ensuring that future educators are not only academically competent but also practically prepared to foster inclusive and effective learning environments.
Keywords: preparedness, experiential learning, teacher education, teaching internship, bachelor of elementary education
APA (7th edition)
Paunillo, J. A. N., Prado-Tordecillas, J. E., Tolentino, D. G. A., Paunillo, G. W. N., & Apostol, T. B. (2026). Academic and practical preparedness of pre-service teachers for experiential learning. Pedagogy Review, 8(1), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.pr-ijetas.8.1.SC-0526-018.
Jericho Andrew N. Paunillo: Conceptualization and Formal Analysis – Took the lead in the conceptualization of the whole paper, ensuring that the research problem, objectives, and scope were clearly defined. He is also in charge of the computation of results after data gathering and was primarily responsible for the analysi s and interpretation of findings, ensuring that the statistical outputs were accurately processed and meaningfully explained in relation to the study’s objectives.
Jonah Eliza PradoTordecillas : Supervision – Provided guidance, supervision, and expert validation throughout the research process, ensuring that the study met institutional and scholarly requirements.
Darlyn Grace A. Tolentino : Writing-original draft – Focused on writing the Introduction and Review of Related Literature, establishing the conceptual and theoretical foundation of the study. She also assisted in the data collection process and ensured that ethical protocols were observed.
Genesis Wesley N. Paunillo : Data Curation – Was responsible for gathering the data from respondents, ensuring accuracy and completeness of survey administration. He also contributed to the organization of responses for analysis.
Trishtan B. Apostol : Writing review and editing – Handled the securing of approval letters and other formal requirements, and took charge of the formatting of the manuscript, ensuring clarity, coherence, and adherence to academic standards.
This research received no external funding.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
This study involved human respondents; however, formal ethical approval was not sought from the authors’ institution. The authors affirm that participation was voluntary, informed consent was obtained, and confidentiality of responses was strictly maintained. No procedures were undertaken that posed risk or harm to participants.
All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the manuscript and its supplementary materials.
AI- assisted language editing was performed using ChatGPT; authors reviewed and approved all content.
– (Not Available).
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. The publisher disclaims any responsibility for errors or omissions.