
Menu


Social Science Lens
Volume 8 | Issue 1 | 2026 | 72 – 85
University Counselor & Clinical Supervisor, Counseling & Psychological Services, De La Salle University, Manila, P hilippines
Article History:
Initial submission: 11 May 2026
First decision: 15 May 2026
Revision received: 10 June 2026
Accepted for publication: 18 June 2026
Online release: 25 June 2026
Ready to submit? Click the button below.
Need more help before you submit?
Workplace mental health remains a critical concern in educational institutions, particularly in contexts characterized by high emotional labor and increasing organizational demands. This study aimed to: (a) assess levels of psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and stress) and professional quality of life (encompassing the subdimensions of compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress) among employees in government educational institutions; (b) examine sleep-related and demographic predictors of mental health outcomes; (c) develop and implement a data-informed psychoeducational intervention; and (d) evaluate intervention outcomes and generate institutional recommendations. Guided by the Job Demands–Resources (JD–R) model and the Input–Process–Outcome (IPO) framework, the study involved 60 teaching and non-teaching personnel in the Philippines. Psychological distress was measured using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), which yielded subscale scores for depression, anxiety, and stress. Professional quality of life was assessed with the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL-5), which measures three subdimensions: compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. Findings revealed predominantly normal to mild levels of depression and anxiety, with stress emerging as the most elevated subdimension of psychological distress. For professional quality of life, compassion satisfaction was moderate to high, while burnout and secondary traumatic stress remained low to average. Correlational analysis indicated that sleep duration, examined as a recovery-related predictor, was significantly associated with stress and burnout. A two-hour psychoeducational intervention was subsequently developed and implemented; evaluation results demonstrated improved mental health literacy, increased coping strategies, and reduced stigma toward help-seeking. The study concludes that the institution operates within a preventive window rather than a crisis stage. Implications for institutional policy, workplace interventions, and sustainable mental health practices are discussed.
Keywords: workplace mental health, stress, burnout, compassion satisfaction, DASS – 21, ProQOL, JD –R model, sleep
APA (7th edition)
Aranda, E. M. D. (2026). Mental health in the workplace: A cross-sectional analysis and program-based intervention using DASS-21 and professional quality of life measures. Social Science Lens, 8(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.ssl-wjhdsr.8.1.SC-0526-007.
The author solely conceived and executed all aspects of the study, including the development of the research concept, design of the methodology, data collection, analysis and interpretation of results, and the formulation of conclusions and recommendations.
This research received no external funding.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This study involved human respondents; however, formal ethical approval was not sought from the authors’ institution. The authors affirm that participation was voluntary, informed consent was obtained, and confidentiality of responses was strictly maintained. No procedures were undertaken that posed risk or harm to the participants.
All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the manuscript and its supplementary materials.
The author used AI tools such as ChatGPT, Jasper AI, and Grammarly, during the preparation of this work to improve language readability and writing clarity. After using these tools, the author reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.
– (not available).
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. The publisher disclaims any responsibility for errors or omissions.