Article credentials

Original Research

Perceived Effectiveness of DRRM Programs Across Thematic Areas: Comparative Perspectives of Beneficiaries and Facilitators in Catanduanes, Philippines

A World Journal of Human Dynamics and Social Relations

ISSN Online: 3028-1997 | Print: 3028-1962

Volume 6 | Issue 1 | 2025 | 114 – 124

Engr. Johnmar F. Cordial, PhD, ORCID No. 0000-0003-4151-1934

Faculty Member, Catanduanes State University–Panganiban Campus, Sta. Ana, Panganiban, Catanduanes, Philippines

Article History:

Initial submission: 19 March 2025
First decision: 24 March 2025
Revision received: 10 October 2025
Accepted for publication: 18 October 2025
Online release: 27 October 2025

Quick links

Ready to submit? Click the button below.

Need more help before you submit?

Abstract

As one of the world’s most hazard-prone countries, the Philippines faces recurring disasters such as typhoons, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions, intensified by climate change. Peripheral provinces like Catanduanes are particularly vulnerable. To address these risks, Republic Act No. 10121 and the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plan (2011–2028) institutionalized a multi-sectoral, community-based framework across four thematic areas: prevention and mitigation, preparedness, response, and rehabilitation/recovery. However, limited comparative analyses exist on stakeholder perceptions of program effectiveness in geographically isolated provinces. Grounded in Stakeholder Theory and Program Evaluation Theory, this study employed a descriptive-comparative quantitative design. A validated researcher-made questionnaire was administered to 444 participants, including Municipal DRRM Officers, Barangay Captains, and household heads across Catanduanes’ eleven municipalities. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples z-tests to assess perceptual differences. Findings indicate that both beneficiaries and facilitators perceive DRRM programs as generally effective. Facilitators reported higher confidence in disaster response and rehabilitation/recovery, while moderate ratings in prevention and preparedness highlight gaps in community engagement and capacity-building. Consensus was observed in prevention, preparedness, and response, but significant perceptual disparities emerged in rehabilitation and recovery. The study underscores the need for inclusive feedback mechanisms, adaptive governance, and participatory risk reduction. A Strategic Action Plan is proposed to strengthen hazard-resilient infrastructure, enhance preparedness through capacity-building and early warning systems, and improve post-disaster rehabilitation and livelihood recovery, ensuring alignment between institutional intentions and community experiences.

Keywords: Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM), stakeholder perceptions, program evaluation, Catanduanes, Philippines, flood-prone communities, preparedness and response, rehabilitation and recovery

Cite this article

APA (7th edition)

Cordial, J. F. (2025). Perceived effectiveness of DRRM programs across thematic areas: Comparative perspectives of beneficiaries and facilitators in Catanduanes, Philippines. Social Science Lens: A World Journal of Human Dynamics and Social Relations, 6(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.ssl-wjhdsr.6.1.SC-1125 011.docx&action=default&mobileredirect=true)

Author contributions

– (Not available).

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Institutional ethics review statement

This study involved human respondents; however, formal ethical approval was not sought from the authors’ institution. The authors affirm that participation was voluntary, informed consent was obtained, and confidentiality of responses was strictly maintained. No procedures were undertaken that posed risk or harm to the participants.

Data availability statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the manuscript and its supplementary materials.

Declaration of generative AI use/assistance

AI-assisted language editing was performed; authors reviewed and approved all content.

Acknowledgement

– (Not available).

Publisher’s disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. The publisher disclaims any responsibility for errors or omissions.

×

Cart