PEDAGOGY REVIEW

An International Journal of Educational Theories, Approaches and Strategies
ISSN (Electronic): 3028-1040 | ISSN (Print): 3028-1059

Open access

Article credentials

Original Research

Instructional Outcomes, Implementation Strategies, and Challenges of Reading Programs in Elementary Schools: Evidence from Bagamanoc, Philippines

Pedagogy Review: An International Journal of Educational Theories, Approaches and Strategies

ISSN (Electronic): 3028-1040 | ISSN (Print): 3028-1059

Volume 7 | Issue 1 | 2026 | 221 – 236

Madonna C. Villarino1 , ORCID No. 0009-0009-1817-0807

Engr. Johnmar F. Cordial2 , PhD, ORCID No. 0000-0003-4151-1934

Yolanda M. Tariman3 , EdD, ORCID No. 0009-0002-7188-8687

1Teacher III, San Rafael Elementary School, Bagamanoc South District, Bagamanoc, Catanduanes, Philippines
2Faculty Member, Catanduanes State University – Panganiban Campus, Panganiban, Catanduanes, Philippines
3Faculty Member (Retired Professor II) Graduate School, Catanduanes Colleges, Virac, Catanduanes, Philippines

Article History:

Initial submission: 19 January 2026
First decision: 23 January 2026
Revision received: 19 February 2026
Accepted for publication: 28 February 2026
Online release: 04 March 2026

Quick links

Ready to submit? Click the button below.

Need more help before you submit?

Abstract

Persistent literacy gaps at the elementary level remain a critical concern in basic education, particularly in contexts where learners face varied linguistic, socio-economic, and instructional constraints; within this landscape, reading programs play a vital contributory role in strengthening foundational literacy skills, alongside other language and learning interventions. This study examined the instructional outcomes, instructional strategies, and implementation challenges of reading programs in public elementary schools in the Bagamanoc North and South Districts, Philippines. Employing a descriptive correlational research design, data were collected from 83 elementary teachers through proportionate stratified sampling using a validated questionnaire with high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .897). Weighted means were used to assess teachers’ perceptions of instructional outcomes, instructional strategies, and implementation challenges, while Pearson’s r determined the relationships among the variables. Findings revealed that reading programs contributed to high instructional outcomes, particularly in reading comprehension, vocabulary development, and learner motivation. Instructional strategies most notably teacher-directed, differentiated, peer-assisted, and technology-supported approaches were frequently utilized and rated highly by teachers. Implementation challenges were experienced at a moderate level, with limited parental support, increased workload, and insufficient access to instructional resources emerging as recurring concerns. Correlation analysis demonstrated a strong positive relationship between instructional strategies and instructional outcomes, a moderate relationship between implementation challenges and instructional outcomes, and no significant relationship between instructional strategies and implementation challenges. These results highlight the central role of effective instructional strategies in enhancing the contribution of reading programs to literacy development despite contextual constraints. An evidence-based action plan is proposed to strengthen teacher capacity, mitigate systemic challenges, and promote the sustainability of elementary reading initiatives in resource-constrained settings.

Keywords: reading programs, literacy development, instructional outcomes, instructional strategies, implementation challenges, elementary education, Bagamanoc, Philippines

Cite this article

APA (7th edition)

Villarino, M. C., Cordial, J. F., & Tariman, Y. M. (2026). Instructional outcomes, implementation strategies, and challenges of reading programs in elementary schools: Evidence from Bagamanoc, Philippines. Pedagogy Review: An International Journal of Educational Theories, Approaches and Strategies, 7(1), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.pr-ijetas.7.1.SC-0126-011

Author contributions

Madonna C. Villarino: Conceptualization, Validation, Resources, Data curation, Writing-original draft, Project administration;
Johnmar F. Cordial: Methodology, Software, Writing-review and editing;
Yolanda M. Tariman: Formal analysis, Investigation, Supervision.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Institutional ethics review statement

This study involved human respondents; however, formal ethical approval was not sought from the authors’ institution. The authors affirm that participation was voluntary, informed consent was obtained, and confidentiality of responses was strictly maintained. No procedures were undertaken that posed risk or harm to the participants.

Data availability statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the manuscript and its supplementary materials.

Declaration of generative AI use/assistance

AI-assisted language editing was performed using ChatGPT; authors reviewed and approved all content.

Acknowledgement

– (Not available).

Publisher’s disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. The publisher disclaims any responsibility for errors or omissions.

×

Cart