Article credentials

Original Research

A Comparative Organizational Performance of ISO-certified and non-ISO-certified Schools Division Offices: Basis for Framework Enhancement

Pedagogy Review

ISSN (Electronic): 3028-1040 | ISSN (Print): 3028-1059

Volume 9 | Issue 1 | 2026 | 18 – 31

Mary Lisette P. Villas-Rojas – ORCID No. 0009-0009-7243-6747

Master in Public Administration , Polytechnic University of the Philippines , Sta. Mesa, Manila, Philippines

Article History:

Initial submission: 06 August 2026
First decision: 13 August 2026
Revision received: 21 September 2026
Accepted for publication: 28 September 2026
Online release: 01 October 2026

Quick links

Ready to submit? Click the button below.

Need more help before you submit?

Abstract

Organizational performance remains a key concern in public sector institutions, with Quality Management Systems (QMS), particularly ISO 9001, widely adopted to enhance service delivery and operational efficiency. Despite its widespread adoption, existing s tudies report mixed findings on the extent to which ISO certification contributes to improving organizational performance, indicating the need for further investigation. This study compared the organizational performance of ISO-certified and non-ISO-certified Schools Division Offices (SDOs) in the Department of Education. It also identified implementation challenges and proposed a framework for performance enhancement. A convergent parallel mixed-method design was employed, integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptiv e statistics and the Mann–Whitney U test, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. Results showed that all five organizational performance dimensions were generally rated as consistently implemented, with Management Responsibility an d Stakeholders’ Participation receiving the highest ratings. However, qualitative findings revealed recurring challenges, including leadership instability, resource constraints, process inconsistencies, limited data utilization, and stakeholder engagement issues. Although ISO-certified SDOs obtained slightly higher mean performance scores than non-ISO-certified SDOs, the difference was not statistically significant, suggesting that ISO certification alone is insufficient to account for variations in organizational performance. The study concludes that organizational performance depends more on the effective implementation of quality management practices than on ISO certification alone. Leadership stability, adequate resources, standardized processes, and evidence-based decision-making are critical determinants of performance. Based on these findings, the study proposes an Organizational Performance Enhancement Framework that promotes continuous improvement, process standardization, and context-responsive quality management practi ces to strengthen organizational performance across Schools Division Offices.

Keywords: ISO 9001, Quality Management System (QMS), organizational performance , Schools Division Offices, public sector, continuous improvement

Cite this article

APA (7th edition)

Villas-Rojas, M. L. P. (2026). A comparative organizational performance of ISO-certified and non-ISO-certified Schools Division Offices: Basis for framework enhancement. Pedagogy Review, 9(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.pr-ijetas.9.1.SC-0826-002.

Copyright @ 202 6. The Author/s. Published by VMC Analytiks Multidisciplinary Journal News Publishing Services . A Comparative Organizational Performance of ISO-certified and non-ISO-certified Schools Division Offices: Basis for Framework Enhancement © 2026 by Mary Lisette P. VillasRojas is an open access article licensed under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) . This permits the copying, redistribution, remixing, transforming, and building upon the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially, provided that approp riate credit is given to the copyright owner/s through proper and standard citation .

Author contributions

The author solely conceived and designed the study; developed the research framework, instruments, and methodology; collected, validated, and analyzed the quantitative and qualitative data; interpreted the findings; prepared the proposed organizational per formance enhancement framework; drafted, reviewed, and revised the manuscript; and approved the final version of the paper for publication. The author assumes full responsibility for the content and integrity of the work.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Institutional ethics review statement

 Ethical approval was obtained from the PUP -Research Management Office – University Research Center with reference code: UREC-2023-1028.

Data availability statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the manuscript and its supplementary materials.

Declaration of generative AI use/assistance

No AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Acknowledgement

– (Not available).

Publisher’s disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. The publisher disclaims any responsibility for errors or omissions.

×

Cart