
Menu


Pedagogy Review
Volume 8 | Issue 1 | 2026 | 246 – 262
Giezhel A. Mijares1, LPT, MA, ORCID No. 0009-0008-3762-7671
Christian Francis C. Prado2, LPT, PhD, ORCID No. 0009-0007-0129-8899
Lowell S. Manseneros3, ORCID No. 0009-0006-9542-4587
¹ Faculty Member, College of Arts and Sciences, University of the Visayas, Colon Street, Cebu City, Philippines
² Faculty Member, Graduate School of Education, St. Paul University Manila, 680 Pedro Gil Street, Malate, Manila, Philippines
³ Teacher I, Don Gerardo Llamera Ouano Memorial National High School, Opao Mandaue City, Cebu, Philippines
Article History:
Initial submission: 05 May 2026
First decision: 02 June 2026
Revision received: 06 August 2026
Accepted for publication: 15 August 2026
Online release: 20 August 2026
Ready to submit? Click the button below.
Need more help before you submit?
Filipino youth use Taglish, Jejemon , and Gay Lingo to communicate, interact with one another and to develop identities in both physical and digital contexts. While prior research has focused on each of these language varieties separately or on language attitudes or structures, very few stud ies have explored how they work together to create and negotiate the social identity of youth. This research utilized a qualitative descriptive research design to explore how Taglish, Jejemon , and Gay Lingo reflect and affect the experiences of Filipino youth as well as the meanings that are attached to these languages. The study was participated by fifteen (15) college students from Cebu City who actively use Taglish, Jejemon and Gay Lingo in their daily communication. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with and digital discourse and analy zed through thematic analysis. Based on Eckert ‘s Community of Practice theory and Silverstein ‘s Theory of Indexicality, the findings suggest that Taglish functions as a marker of bilingualism, education level or education background, and cosmopolitanism; Jejemon provides means by which peer solidarity, creativity, and resistance to linguistic elitism are expressed; and Gay Lingo provides a place for humor and expression of performative identity through different youth communities, including LGBTQ+. Collectively, these linguistic innovations provide Filipino youth with various interrelated resources that help them develop identity, build relationships with each other, and express themselves through current new technology concepts. This research adds to the body of work in sociolinguistics by showing that young people’s use of language is not only a way of communicating but is also an evolving form of building their identities. In addition, this research will help language education, digital communication, and langua ge policy by highlighting youth’s creativity in using language as a valid and important way of performing their identities.
Keywords: youth language , Taglish, Jejemon, Gay lingo, social identity , digital communication
APA (7th edition)
Mijares, G. A., Prado, C. F. C., &; Manseneros, L. S. (2026). Taglish, Jejemon, and Gay Lingo: Linguistic innovation and social identity among Filipino youth. Pedagogy Review, 8(1), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.pr- ijetas.8.1.SC-0526-002.
Copyright @ 2026. The Author/s. Published by VMC Analytiks Multidisciplinary Journal News Publishing Services. Levels of Preparedness, Extent of Teaching Strategies, and Classroom Management Practices of Kindergarten Teachers in Catanduanes, Philippines © 2026 by Maria O. Baloloy, Juan Sto. Tomas Torreja and Johnmar F. Cordial is an open access article licensed under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0). This permits the copying, redistribution, remixing, transforming, and building upon the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially, provided that appropriate credit is given to the copyright owner/s through proper and standard citation.
Giezhel A. Mijares: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft, Ethics Approval
Christian Francis C. Prado: Writing – Review & Editing, Validation
Lowell S. Manseneros: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft, Ethics Approval.
This research received no external funding.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
This study involved human respondents; however, formal ethical approval was not sought from the authors’ institution. The authors affirm that participation was voluntary, informed consent was obtained, and confidentiality of responses was strictly maintained. No procedures were undertaken that posed risk or harm to the participants.
All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the manuscript.
AI-assisted language editing was performed using ChatGPT ; authors reviewed and approved all content.
– (Not available).
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. The publisher disclaims any responsibility for errors or omissions.