
Menu


Pedagogy Review
Volume 8 | Issue 1 | 2026 | 62 – 77
University Counselor, De La Salle University, 2401 Taft Avenue, Malate, Manila, Philippines
Article History:
Initial submission: 27 April 2026
First decision: 30 April 2026
Revision received: 28 May 2026
Accepted for publication: 03 June 2026
Online release: 09 June 2026
Ready to submit? Click the button below.
Need more help before you submit?
The transition to college represents a critical developmental period that requires students to adapt to new academic demands, social environments, and increased personal autonomy. Central to successful adjustment are engagement and connectedness, which are associated with academic persistence, psychological well-being, and social integration. This study examined the preliminary effectiveness of the Fostering Engagement and Connectedness Together (FECT) Program, a structured positive psychology group intervention grounded in the EPOCH model. Using a one-group pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design without a control group, 40 college students participated in a six-session intervention focused on mental health awareness, motivation enhancement, goal setting, and relationship building. Standardized measures of engagement, connectedness, and psychological well-being were administered before and after the intervention. Results indicated statistically significant improvements in engagement (t(39) = 7.85, p < .001, d = 1.24), connectedness (t(39) = 8.31, p < .001, d = 1.31), and well-being (t(39) = 9.02, p < .001, d = 1.42), with all effect sizes in the large range. Cohen’s d values were computed using the standard deviation of the difference scores for paired-samples data. These findings provide preliminary evidence that structured, group-based interventions grounded in positive psychology may support students’ adjustment to college life by enhancing academic engagement and sense of belonging. However, the absence of a control group limits causal interpretation of the findings. The study highlights the potential value of integrating engagement and connectedness-focused programs within higher education to promote holistic student development and well-being.
Keywords: engagement, connectedness, positive psychology, college students, EPOCH model, group intervention, well-being, higher education
APA (7th edition)
Navarez, J. C. (2026). Changes in student engagement, connectedness, and well-being following a positive psychology group intervention: A quasi-experimental study. Pedagogy Review, 8(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.pr-ijetas.8.1.SC-0426-024.
This manuscript was prepared and completed by the author, who was responsible for all aspects of the study, including conceptualization of the research design, literature review, methodology development, instrument preparation, data collection, statistical analysis, and manuscript writing and revision.
This research received no external funding.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
The study followed the ethical guidelines concerning human research. The author secured Research Ethics Clearance from the University Research Ethics Board. This is to safeguard the rights, safety, dignity, and well-being of everyone who participates in the research study. It was also to determine the protocol in the research work involving human subjects and to know the risks involved, whether they are acceptable or in violation of certain ethical procedures.
Due to ethical restrictions, the data are not publicly available but may be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
The author acknowledges the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in the preparation of this manuscript. Particularly, ChatGPT was used for grammar correction and paraphrasing. Grammarly was used for grammar refinement. All intellectual content, analysis, and final interpretations are the original work of the author, who takes full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the manuscript.
– (Not available).
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. The publisher disclaims any responsibility for errors or omissions.