PEDAGOGY REVIEW

An International Journal of Educational Theories, Approaches and Strategies
ISSN (Electronic): 3028-1040 | ISSN (Print): 3028-1059

Open access

Article credentials

Original Research

Exploring Students’ Attributions for Success and Failure in Algebra

Pedagogy Review: An International Journal of Educational Theories, Approaches and Strategies

ISSN (Electronic): 3028-1040 | ISSN (Print): 3028-1059

Volume 8 | Issue 1 | 2026 | 1 – 17

Albert A. Suarez 1
Ethel D. Nabor 2
Lenny Joy Saan 3
Marry Ann Anore 4

1Bohol Island State University – Bilar Campus, C.P.G. North Avenue, Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines
2Holy Name University, Janssen Heights, J. A. Clarin Street , Dampas District , Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines
3Mahayag National High School, Loay Interior Road, Barangay Mahayag, San Miguel, Bohol, Philippines
4Estaca Integrated School, Estaca, Pilar, Bohol, Philippines

Article History:

Initial submission: 05 February 2026
First decision: 10 February 2026
Revision received: 20 April 2026
Accepted for publication: 28 April 2026
Online release: 08 May 2026

Quick links

Ready to submit? Click the button below.

Need more help before you submit?

Abstract

Attribution Theory posits that how students explain their academic successes and failures profoundly shapes their motivation, behaviors, and future performance. This study explored students’ attributions in the context of Algebra, using Weiner’s Attributio n Theory (1985) as the guiding framework. Employing a quantitative descriptive – correlational design, the research investigated the internal and external factors that students believe contribute to either their success or failure in Algebra. A total of 54 E nvironmental Science students from Bohol Island State University – Bilar Campus participated in the study through a validated, researcher – made questionnaire that captured attribution patterns across six key dimensions: ability, effort, task difficulty, sup port, emotional states, and growth mindset. Findings revealed that students primarily credited their success in Algebra to controllable factors such as sustained effort, instructional quality, and curriculum structure. They strongly endorse growth mindset beliefs, particularly that Algebra skills can improve through practice and strategic learning. In contrast, failure was most commonly attributed to procrastination, poor study habits, and math- related anxiety, rather than an unchangeable lack of ability. S tatistical analyses showed no significant difference in attribution patterns based on sex (p = 0.081) or academic strand (p = 0.741). Moreover, the correlation between attribution scores and actual Algebra performance was very weak and not statistically si gnificant (r = – 0.107, p = 0.441), suggesting that beliefs alone may not directly predict outcomes without the presence of consistent academic behaviors. Overall, the results highlight the importance of nurturing adaptive attributions and emotional resilie nce in Algebra instruction. Interventions that strengthen effort regulation, address anxiety, and reinforce students’ belief in their capacity to improve could bridge the gap between attributional beliefs and academic performance.

Keywords: Attribution Theory, Algebra, academic performance, growth mindset, internal and external attributions

Cite this article

APA (7th edition)

Suarez, A. A., Nabor, E. D., Saan, L. J., & Anore, M. A. (2026). Exploring students’ attributions for success and failure in algebra. Pedagogy Review: An International Journal of Educational Theories, Approaches and Strategies, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.pr-ijetas.8.1.SC-0226-005.

Author contributions

Albert A. Suarez: Conceptualization; Introduction; Methods
Ethel D. Nabor & Lenny Joy Saan: Data gathering; Statistical analysis; Results
Marry Ann E. Anore: Institutional ethics; Conclusion; Recommendations; References.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Institutional ethics review statement

This study involved human respondents; however, formal ethical approval was not sought from the authors’ institution. The authors affirm that participation was voluntary, informed consent was obtained, and confidentiality of responses was strictly maintain ed. No procedures were undertaken that posed risk or harm to the participants.

Data availability statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the manuscript and its supplementary materials.

Declaration of generative AI use/assistance

AI- assisted language editing was performed using C opilot to reduce/compress the literatures ; authors reviewed and approved all content s.

Acknowledgement

– (Not available).

Publisher’s disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. The publisher disclaims any responsibility for errors or omissions.

×

Cart