Received: 04 May 2024 Accepted: 08 May 2024 Published: 18 May 2024
MEMBER:
Volume 1, Issue 1, 1st Quarter 2024, pp. 52 – 65
A Comparative Analysis of Non-Cyanide and Cyanide Gold
Leaching Technologies: Lessons Learned from the Failed CLINN
GEM Facility and Promising Results of the REVIVE SSMB
Project in Itogon, Benguet
Prince Chukunalu Edike, Melissa May M. Boado, Maria Corazon
D. Ocampo, Scarlet Gwen Facsoy, Jason Leung, Rancel Banta
Abstract:
This research paper presents a comparative analysis of a non-cyanide gold leaching
technologies implemented in the small-scale mining community of Itogon Benguet
against a potential gold recovery method with Free Cyanide decontamination and
Sodium Cyanide recovery system. The study evaluates the failed CLINN GEM facility and
the successful REVIVE SSMB project, focusing on technology readiness and acceptance,
operational efficiency, and community engagement. The results demonstrate that the
failure of the CLINN GEM facility was attributed to its low community acceptance, high
operating costs, and complexity, hindering its practicality and scalability. In contrast, the
REVIVE SSMB project achieved exceptional results through an alternative gold ore
leaching process using Cyanidation CIP method, driven by strong community
engagement, cost-effectiveness, sustainable wastewater/tailings discharge management
system and simplified operation approach even for the recovery of gold from complex
and low-grade Au ore from the locality. For a viability assessment, a stochastic model for
the technology feasibility and project optional valuation under diverse uncertainty
consideration for community adoption and expansion presentable to potential investors
or for the option right to accept and manage the technology as demonstrated. This
research simulated the viability of the REVIVE SSMB approach with a high predictability
using Monte Carlo Model through Real Option Analysis; and under the worst-case
scenario at 50th percentile (median) 74.53% recovery was achieved. Repeatedly with a
similar 50th percentile simulation under an optimized condition with pulp density of 44-
50% and 3kg per ton of activated carbon loading during flotation yielded a gold recovery
of 91%. Hence, it arguably viable, coupling with the 98 to 99% free cyanide
decontamination rate and the 55% NaCN recovery successful discharge management
system under the REVIVE SSMB 6 months project model. Keywords: Gold Leaching, Cyanidation, Recovery, CLINN GEM, REVIVE SSMB, Cyanide decontamination, and Itogon, Benguet
1. Journal Description 2. Select Journal a. Declaration of Originality b. Select the Journal c. Paper Formatting d. Initial Manuscript Submission e. Peer Review Process f. Manuscript Revision g. Editing Services h. Final Manuscript Submission i. Acknowledgement to Publish j. Copyright Matters k. Inhouse Publication
Article History
Received: 04 May 2024 Accepted: 08 May 2024 Published: 18 May 2024
Volume 1, Issue 1, 1st Quarter 2024, pp. 52 – 65
A Comparative Analysis of Non-Cyanide and Cyanide Gold
Leaching Technologies: Lessons Learned from the Failed CLINN
GEM Facility and Promising Results of the REVIVE SSMB
Project in Itogon, Benguet
Prince Chukunalu Edike, Melissa May M. Boado, Maria Corazon
D. Ocampo, Scarlet Gwen Facsoy, Jason Leung, Rancel Banta
Abstract:
This research paper presents a comparative analysis of a non-cyanide gold leaching
technologies implemented in the small-scale mining community of Itogon Benguet
against a potential gold recovery method with Free Cyanide decontamination and
Sodium Cyanide recovery system. The study evaluates the failed CLINN GEM facility and
the successful REVIVE SSMB project, focusing on technology readiness and acceptance,
operational efficiency, and community engagement. The results demonstrate that the
failure of the CLINN GEM facility was attributed to its low community acceptance, high
operating costs, and complexity, hindering its practicality and scalability. In contrast, the
REVIVE SSMB project achieved exceptional results through an alternative gold ore
leaching process using Cyanidation CIP method, driven by strong community
engagement, cost-effectiveness, sustainable wastewater/tailings discharge management
system and simplified operation approach even for the recovery of gold from complex
and low-grade Au ore from the locality. For a viability assessment, a stochastic model for
the technology feasibility and project optional valuation under diverse uncertainty
consideration for community adoption and expansion presentable to potential investors
or for the option right to accept and manage the technology as demonstrated. This
research simulated the viability of the REVIVE SSMB approach with a high predictability
using Monte Carlo Model through Real Option Analysis; and under the worst-case
scenario at 50th percentile (median) 74.53% recovery was achieved. Repeatedly with a
similar 50th percentile simulation under an optimized condition with pulp density of 44-
50% and 3kg per ton of activated carbon loading during flotation yielded a gold recovery
of 91%. Hence, it arguably viable, coupling with the 98 to 99% free cyanide
decontamination rate and the 55% NaCN recovery successful discharge management
system under the REVIVE SSMB 6 months project model. Keywords: Gold Leaching, Cyanidation, Recovery, CLINN GEM, REVIVE SSMB, Cyanide decontamination, and Itogon, Benguet
1. Journal Description 2. Select Journal a. Declaration of Originality b. Select the Journal c. Paper Formatting d. Initial Manuscript Submission e. Peer Review Process f. Manuscript Revision g. Editing Services h. Final Manuscript Submission i. Acknowledgement to Publish j. Copyright Matters k. Inhouse Publication
Article History
Received: 04 May 2024 Accepted: 08 May 2024 Published: 18 May 2024
Volume 1, Issue 1, 1st Quarter 2024, pp. 52 – 65
A Comparative Analysis of Non-Cyanide and Cyanide Gold
Leaching Technologies: Lessons Learned from the Failed CLINN
GEM Facility and Promising Results of the REVIVE SSMB
Project in Itogon, Benguet
Prince Chukunalu Edike, Melissa May M. Boado, Maria Corazon
D. Ocampo, Scarlet Gwen Facsoy, Jason Leung, Rancel Banta
Abstract:
This research paper presents a comparative analysis of a non-cyanide gold leaching
technologies implemented in the small-scale mining community of Itogon Benguet
against a potential gold recovery method with Free Cyanide decontamination and
Sodium Cyanide recovery system. The study evaluates the failed CLINN GEM facility and
the successful REVIVE SSMB project, focusing on technology readiness and acceptance,
operational efficiency, and community engagement. The results demonstrate that the
failure of the CLINN GEM facility was attributed to its low community acceptance, high
operating costs, and complexity, hindering its practicality and scalability. In contrast, the
REVIVE SSMB project achieved exceptional results through an alternative gold ore
leaching process using Cyanidation CIP method, driven by strong community
engagement, cost-effectiveness, sustainable wastewater/tailings discharge management
system and simplified operation approach even for the recovery of gold from complex
and low-grade Au ore from the locality. For a viability assessment, a stochastic model for
the technology feasibility and project optional valuation under diverse uncertainty
consideration for community adoption and expansion presentable to potential investors
or for the option right to accept and manage the technology as demonstrated. This
research simulated the viability of the REVIVE SSMB approach with a high predictability
using Monte Carlo Model through Real Option Analysis; and under the worst-case
scenario at 50th percentile (median) 74.53% recovery was achieved. Repeatedly with a
similar 50th percentile simulation under an optimized condition with pulp density of 44-
50% and 3kg per ton of activated carbon loading during flotation yielded a gold recovery
of 91%. Hence, it arguably viable, coupling with the 98 to 99% free cyanide
decontamination rate and the 55% NaCN recovery successful discharge management
system under the REVIVE SSMB 6 months project model. Keywords: Gold Leaching, Cyanidation, Recovery, CLINN GEM, REVIVE SSMB, Cyanide decontamination, and Itogon, Benguet
1. Journal Description 2. Select Journal a. Declaration of Originality b. Select the Journal c. Paper Formatting d. Initial Manuscript Submission e. Peer Review Process f. Manuscript Revision g. Editing Services h. Final Manuscript Submission i. Acknowledgement to Publish j. Copyright Matters k. Inhouse Publication