This study provides a comprehensive assessment of Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) program
implementation in Catanduanes, Philippines, a region highly vulnerable to natural hazards. Adopting a
descriptive-comparative quantitative research design, the study investigates the perceived implementation of
the program from the perspectives of program providers (43 municipal and barangay officials) and beneficiaries
(401 household heads). The assessment spans the four thematic areas of DRRM: prevention and mitigation,
preparedness, response, and rehabilitation and recovery. Guided by Stakeholder Theory and Systems Theory,
and utilizing an Input-Process-Output (IPO) model, the research quantifies perceptual differences and aims to
offer strategic recommendations. Using weighted mean and z-tests for independent samples, data analysis
reveals consistent disparities, with providers generally reporting higher implementation levels than
beneficiaries. Key findings indicate strong perceived implementation in "Increase of awareness and capacity"
and "On-time safe evacuation," but significant gaps in areas like infrastructure resilience and access to disaster
financing. These perceptual gaps underscore challenges in coordination, trust, and program impact. The study
emphasizes the critical need for inclusive, evidence-based assessments that integrate lived experiences with
institutional metrics. The proposed strategic action plan aims to bridge these identified gaps, fostering more
resilient and context-sensitive disaster governance in Catanduanes.
Keywords: Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM), Catanduanes Island, natural hazards, stakeholder
perception, beneficiaries, program providers, community resilience, strategic action plan
1. Journal Description 2. Select Journal a. Declaration of Originality b. Select the Journal c. Paper Formatting d. Initial Manuscript Submission e. Peer Review Process f. Manuscript Revision g. Editing Services h. Final Manuscript Submission i. Acknowledgement to Publish j. Copyright Matters k. Inhouse Publication