Article credentials

Original Research

Perceived Gains, Implementation Barriers, and Effectiveness of Reading Recovery Strategies: Evidence from Viga East and West Districts, Schools Division of Catanduanes

Pedagogy Review: An International Journal of Educational Theories, Approaches and Strategies

ISSN (Electronic): 3028-1040 | ISSN (Print): 3028-1059

Volume 7 | Issue 1 | 2026 | 17 – 30

Harlene T. Villegas1, ORCID No. 0009-0001-5646-5216

Pedrito Jose V. Bermudo2, EdD, PhD, ORCID No. 0000-0002-5944-7128

Engr. Johnmar F. Cordial3, PhD, ORCID No. 0000-0003-4151-1934

1Teacher III, Osmena Elementary School, Viga West District, Division of Catanduanes, Viga, Catanduanes, Philippines 
2College of Business Administration Dean & Director for Research, Catanduanes Colleges, Virac, Catanduanes, Philippines 
3Faculty Member, Catanduanes State University–Panganiban Campus, Panganiban, Catanduanes, Philippines 

Article History:

Initial submission: 22 November 2025
First decision: 28 November 2025
Revision received: 30 December 2025
Accepted for publication: 08 January 2026
Online release: 14 January 2026

Quick links

Ready to submit? Click the button below.

Need more help before you submit?

Abstract

Reading proficiency remains a critical predictor of learners’ academic success, socio-emotional development, and lifelong engagement with learning. Despite national and regional efforts, early literacy deficits persist in rural Philippine contexts, particularly in low-resource, geographically isolated districts. Structured interventions such as Reading Recovery (RR) programs have demonstrated potential to enhance decoding, comprehension, motivation, and learner confidence; however, localized evidence on their implementation, perceived gains, and operational barriers remains limited. This study examined teachers’ perceptions of gains, barriers, and overall effectiveness of RR strategies in the Viga East and West Districts of the Schools Division of Catanduanes. Employing a descriptive-correlational design, data were collected from 128 teachers across 28 public elementary schools using a validated survey instrument. Descriptive statistics summarized levels of perceived gains, implementation barriers, and program effectiveness, while Pearson correlation assessed relationships among these variables. Findings indicate that teachers perceive RR strategies as effective in fostering learner confidence, motivation, home–school collaboration, and moderate improvements in fluency and comprehension. The most frequently encountered barriers were learner attendance, time constraints, limited reading materials, and insufficient teacher training. Correlation analyses revealed that perceived gains significantly relate to overall program effectiveness (r = .518), while implementation barriers also exhibit a strong positive association with effectiveness (r = .650), highlighting the influence of both program strengths and operational challenges on instructional outcomes. Based on these findings, a context-specific intervention plan is proposed, focusing on enhancing learner engagement, optimizing instructional time, strengthening teacher capacity, expanding access to culturally relevant reading materials, and institutionalizing monitoring mechanisms. The study provides empirical insights for improving early literacy interventions in rural, resource constrained settings and contributes actionable strategies for sustaining Reading Recovery programs in the Philippines and similar educational contexts.

Keywords: reading recovery, early literacy, implementation barriers, program effectiveness, Viga East and West Districts, Catanduanes

Cite this article

APA (7th edition)

Villegas, H. T., Bermudo, P. J. V., & Cordial, J. F. (2026). Perceived gains, implementation barriers, and effectiveness of reading recovery strategies: Evidence from Viga East and West Districts, Schools Division of Catanduanes. Pedagogy Review: An International Journal of Educational Theories, Approaches and Strategies, 7(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.pr-ijetas.7.1.SC-1125-034

Author contributions

Harlene T. Villegas: Conceptualization, Validation, Resources, Data Curation, Project Administration;
Pedrito Jose V. Bermudo – Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing Original Draft, Investigation;
Johnmar F. Cordial – Software, Writing – review and Editing.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Institutional ethics review statement

This study involved human respondents; however, formal ethical approval was not sought from the authors’ institution. The authors affirm that participation was voluntary, informed consent was obtained, and confidentiality of responses was strictly maintained. No procedures were undertaken that posed risk or harm to the participants.

Data availability statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the manuscript and its supplementary materials.

Declaration of generative AI use/assistance

AI-assisted language editing was performed using ChatGPT; authors reviewed approved all content.

Acknowledgement

– (Not applicable).

Publisher’s disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. The publisher disclaims any responsibility for errors or omissions.

×

Cart