This study examined the relationship between data-driven decision making (DDDM) and the optimization of
mathematics curriculum planning and development among school leaders and teachers in selected public high
schools in the District of Naic, Cavite, Philippines. Using a descriptive correlational research design, the study
measured the extent of DDDM through five dimensions – educator data literacy, availability and quality of
educational data, decision-making culture, collaborative practices, and alignment with curriculum standards –
while assessing curriculum optimization across seven criteria, including curriculum objectives alignment,
content coherence, instructional strategies integration, assessment alignment, stakeholder involvement,
contextualization, and iterative review. The participants consisted of mathematics teachers and school leaders
from five public secondary schools, providing complementary perspectives on administrative and instructional
practices. Findings revealed strong integration of data use and collaborative practices in decision making, as
well as high levels of curriculum optimization; however, gaps remained in directly linking data analysis to
instructional improvement, enhancing data accessibility, engaging stakeholders more meaningfully, and
formalizing structured review processes. The study also identified a significant positive relationship between
DDDM and mathematics curriculum optimization, suggesting that evidence-based decision making contributes
to more effective, responsive, and contextually relevant curriculum practices. Based on these results,
professional development initiatives focusing on data literacy were proposed to further enhance the
effectiveness of data-informed curriculum planning.
Keywords: data-driven decision making, curriculum optimization, mathematics education, educational
leadership, professional development, public high schools, evidence-based practice
1. Journal Description 2. Select Journal a. Declaration of Originality b. Select the Journal c. Paper Formatting d. Initial Manuscript Submission e. Peer Review Process f. Manuscript Revision g. Editing Services h. Final Manuscript Submission i. Acknowledgement to Publish j. Copyright Matters k. Inhouse Publication